 Below is an important message from one of our highly valued sponsors. Please read it carefully as they have some special information to share with you.
Man who Predicted Trump 2016 Win:
“Prepare for Mid-Term Meltdown” Dear Reader, In 2016, one major election model gave Hillary Clinton more than a 99% chance of winning right up until election night. But right before the election… Former advisor to the CIA, the Pentagon and the White House Jim Rickards went on multiple TV news programs… And predicted Trump would win. What he’s predicting now is even more shocking. Click here to see it because it’s a BOMBSHELL… And it could soon send shockwaves through the financial markets. Regards, Matt Insley
Publisher, Paradigm Press
Wednesday's Featured News
Meta’s Earnings Drop Shows Wall Street Wants More Than Ad GrowthAuthored by Leo Miller. Article Posted: 8/5/2026. 
Key Points
- Meta Platforms beat revenue estimates in Q2, but legal and severance expenses drove a steep EPS miss and pressured investor sentiment.
- Analysts cut price targets after the report, but most still remain bullish, with no Sell ratings tracked.
- Meta’s AI spending is raising the bar for future growth, making non-advertising catalysts like compute sales, model monetization and subscriptions increasingly important.
- Special Report: The Department of War is on a gold mine's filings
Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META)’ Q2 earnings distinctly disappointed investors, as demonstrated by the stock’s 8% decline after the report. Wall Street analysts did not react well to the report either, with many substantially lowering their price targets afterward.
These reductions were also more significant than those following past earnings reports. However, analysts have not abandoned this Magnificent Seven giant by any stretch of the imagination, with most still pointing to substantial upside ahead. Meta’s Q2 Report: The Good, the Bad, and the UglyMeta managed to beat sales estimates in Q2, with revenue rising 28% year over year (YOY). Despite the beat, there were few positive aspects to Meta’s report beyond its revenue performance. Meta posted a steep earnings-per-share (EPS) miss, driven largely by legal issues that surfaced earlier in 2026 and resulted in a multibillion-dollar expense. To make matters worse, the company had to pay for its recent layoffs, incurring more than $1 billion in severance expenses that also put substantial downward pressure on EPS. Although adjusting for these expenses makes Meta’s EPS result look much less disappointing, these are still real costs for the company. The company indicated that substantial legal expenses could persist, noting that its youth-related legal issues could result in a material loss. The negatives did not end there. The midpoint of Meta’s revenue guidance also came in below expectations, an outcome that is particularly unfavorable given the company’s massive AI spending. Additionally, Meta beat sales estimates by the smallest margin among hyperscalers in Q2. Meta continues to grow at an annual rate of more than 25%, a strong pace for a company of its size. However, with such substantial AI spending helping drive this growth, the market is unlikely to give the company the benefit of the doubt when key metrics fall short. Analyst price targets indicate that sell-side analysts may also be reducing the amount of leeway they are willing to give Meta. Meta Price Targets Take a Big HitThe MarketBeat consensus price target for Meta sits near $790, a figure that implies significant upside of more than 30%. However, the picture looks less aggressive when measured against analyst targets updated after the company’s report. Other current target averages sit closer to the mid-$700s, implying upside in the high-20% range rather than the low-30% range. This shift comes as analysts substantially lowered their targets after Meta’s report. The average price target, based on MarketBeat’s historical data, decreased by more than 10%, marking a larger decline than the shares themselves. Some of Meta’s most bullish analysts cut their price targets by more than $100, including Rosenblatt and Susquehanna. Rosenblatt previously had a $1,015 target on Meta but lowered it by 13% to $883. Susquehanna’s reduction was even more drastic, with its target falling 28% from $900 to $650. Analysts have often moved their price targets along a trajectory similar to Meta’s post-earnings price action. However, in many of these instances, price target movements have been relatively favorable, rising more when Meta gains and falling less when it declines. It is noteworthy that the percentage decrease in targets was slightly greater than the decline in the shares. This indicates a greater deterioration in analyst sentiment after the report than in past quarters. Still, analyst ratings provide some solace, with Meta having 39 Buy, eight Hold and zero Sell ratings. The Waiting Game for Non-Advertising Growth Catalysts ContinuesThe market holds Meta to a high standard, especially regarding growth, as its AI investments are intended to provide additional tailwinds. At this point, it is becoming increasingly difficult for Meta to justify its AI spending based on advertising growth alone. The company needs alternative catalysts to restore confidence among many investors. The good news is that Meta is working to pull several growth levers, although many of these initiatives remain in their early stages and have yet to produce tangible results. One potential avenue is selling its excess compute to third parties experiencing strong demand for AI services. Additionally, Meta is working to monetize its Muse Spark 1.1 model, which was released in July. This marks the first time Meta will attempt to monetize a model directly through token sales. Meta is expanding access to Muse Spark 1.1 through popular model-distribution channels such as OpenRouter. Lastly, Meta recently released subscription offerings that could drive meaningful growth if they gain significant adoption among Facebook and Instagram users. There is still reason for optimism around Meta stock. However, investors should weigh the legal risks facing the company, as well as the possibility that its non-advertising growth may take substantial time to materialize. . |